Bourdais wins race and fourth straight championship

Autoracing Betting Lines

10/21/2007 - Surfers Paradise, Australia (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Sebastien Bourdais clinched the 2007 Champ Car Series title in style, winning Sunday's Lexmark Indy 300 on the streets of Surfers Paradise. The No.1 Newman/Haas/Lanigan driver crossed the finish line 6.775 seconds ahead of Justin Wilson.

The victory was Bourdais' seventh of the season and 30th of his Champ Car career. The fourth consecutive Vanderbilt Cup ties him with Mario Andretti for second most in the series behind A.J. Foyt's seven championships.

"I can't thank this McDonald's crew enough," said Bourdais. "They put me there once again...This one is really sweet."

A clean start for pole winner Will Power gave him the early race lead while Bruno Junqueira (stalled at start) and Paul Tracy (spin) had first lap problems.

With Tracy's problem, points leader Bourdais inherited third place. For the Newman/Haas/Lanigan driver, a 12th-place of better finish would clinch his fourth consecutive Champ Car title.

Power, the local favorite from Toowoomba, Australia, quickly built his lead to 1.953 seconds after six laps. The lead steadied at just under two seconds with Bourdais about three seconds behind until lap nine when a debris caution flag slowed the field.

Most of the field elected to pit for the first of three stops, but Power had an incident with David Martinez on pit road and it cost him big time.

Robert Doornbos, Tracy and Junqueira inherited the top-three positions by not pitting with Bourdais in fourth and Oriol Servia, Friday's provisional pole winner, in fifth place. Power was 15th.

The drivers stayed in line for the next few laps until a caution flag when Katherine Legge and Power came together on lap 19. It appeared that Power made an overly aggressive move that failed to work out.

Doornbos' pit crew quickly called him in before the yellow came out for fuel and new rubber. Bourdais inherited the lead with Servia just behind.

Bourdais knows what to do with the lead and by lap 25 his lead was 2.682 seconds.

But strategy might do Bourdais and Servia in. Tracy and Doornbos had worked all the caution flags and might only have to stop one more time to the leaders two. Tracy was up to seventh and the first of those who might have the advantage.

By lap 31 Tracy had passed two more cars and was up to fifth. When the leader pitted on the next few laps, Tracy inherited the lead. But Bourdais and Servia were lapping almost a second faster than Tracy and slid into second and third, respectively even after their stop.

Servia made a mistake on lap 37 spinning and giving up third place to Wilson. Wilson caught Tracy and Bourdais and the three were almost eight seconds ahead of fourth place.

Wilson was flying and on lap 39 he got around Bourdais, who admittedly didn't need the position to clinch a championship. The No.9 was just 0.596 seconds behind Tracy and pressing the leader.

Tracy pitted on lap 40, for tires and fuel, probably his last stop of the day. He returned in fifth place, but the first driver who was done with pit road.

Wilson pitted from the lead with a 40-second lead on Tracy and thanks to some fast laps, came out 14 seconds ahead of him, still in second place. Bourdais still had one stop to make and a 31-second lead on Wilson. He got stuck behind Mario Dominguez on lap 47, how much of his lead would that cost him?

Finally on lap 48, Bourdais pulled down pit lane. After a perfect stop he came back onto the track still in first place with a 5.510 second lead on Wilson and 25.170 second on Tracy. From there it was just a matter of making no mistakes.

Bourdais didn't slip up and won for the seventh time this season. He clinched his fourth consecutive title as he heads to Formula One for 2008. Bruno Junqueira took the final podium position when Tracy ran out of fuel with one lap to go.

The final race of the 2007 season is set for Sunday, November 11th in Mexico City.

Vagess Autoracing Betting News

<< 10-man Chivas USA wins Western crown over Houston
Carson, CA (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - CD Chivas USA earned its first conference championship after battling to a scoreless draw with defending MLS Cup champions Houston on Saturday night at The Home Depot Center. The improbable Weste

<< Calgary dumps Edmonton
Calgary, AB (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Miikka Kiprusoff stopped 17-of-18 shots to lead Calgary over Edmonton, 4-1, at Pengrowth Saddledome. Jarome Iginla and Dion Phaneuf picked up a goal and two assists each for the Flames, who have won four of

<< Maltby, Zetterberg lead Detroit over Phoenix
Glendale, AZ (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Henrik Zetterberg scored a goal and assisted on another as the Detroit Red Wings beat the Phoenix Coyotes, 5-2. Zetterberg is leading the league with 17 points and has at least one point in all nine games

<< LSU stuns Auburn with last-second touchdown
Baton Rouge, LA (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - It was a call that took guts and kept LSU's national title hopes alive. Matt Flynn's 22-yard touchdown pass to Demetrius Byrd with one second left in the game boosted fifth-ranked LSU to a 30-24 win o

<< Yale survives three OTs to beat Penn
Philadelphia (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Jack Siedlecki and his Yale Bulldogs didn't care how they won on Saturday afternoon at historic Franklin Field. They were just glad to leave town with a 26-20 triple-overtime victory over Penn in Ivy League play.

Nabokov, Sharks blank Predators >>
San Jose, CA (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Evgeni Nabokov stopped all 22 shots he faced to post his first shutout of the season as San Jose blanked Nashville, 3-0, at HP Pavilion. Jeremy Roenick, Patrick Marleau and Milan Michalek scored for the Sha

B.C. tops Edmonton, creeps closer to first place >>
Vancouver, BC (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Jarious Jackson threw for two touchdowns and Ian Smart returned a punt 81 yards for another score as British Columbia beat Edmonton, 37-26, damaging the playoff hopes of the Eskimos. BC's Joe Smith scored

San Francisco49ers >>
Waived linebacker Hannibal Navies; signed fullback Zak Keasey from the practice squad.

Elway's son commits to Arizona State >>
Denver, CO (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Jack Elway, son of NFL Hall of Fame quarterback John Elway, has committed to play football next year at Arizona State, the Rocky Mountain News reported. The younger Elway is currently the signal caller for Cherr

Pettersen declared winner in South Korea >>
Kyeongbook, South Korea (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Gusting winds prevented players from putting on the greens at Mauna Ocean Golf & Resort Sunday and that forced officials to cancel the final round of the Hana Bank - KOLON Championship and declare Suza

How to bet pro football

There is little doubt that the NFL is where the sportsbooks see the most action and also make the most loot. The NFL possesses betting friendly attributes that are unlike any of the other major sports. First off, there are relatively few teams to keep track of in comparison to college football betting or college basketball. And second, these teams play only once a week which makes staying on top of the results much easier than it is in the daily leagues such as the NBA, NHL, and MLB.

These dynamics, along with the sheer excitement of watching and wagering on football, brings more square action to the table than any of the other sports. Almost every Tom, Dick and Harry in America is an NFL expert in their own mind and that is precisely what the oddsmakers prey upon.

Understanding who bets the games is just as important as understanding which teams are playing the games. The market at times will dictate price, which in the betting world means the oddsmakers cater to the public rather than reality.

Knowing the market inside and out is the basis of our NFL handicapping model. That is, our approach to NFL handicapping is of the contrarian or value seeking variety. We will at times place a higher premium on public sentiment than on the fundamentals. This strategy dictates playing dogs and/or lesser competent teams, or teams the public wants nothing to do with. Or better yet, fading the teams the oddsmakers want you to bet on.

Along these same lines, we carry a similar notion that the first week of the NFL season presents one of the ripest opportunities for the astute gambler. This conflicts with conventional wisdom and/or handicapping lore, as most would say it is better to watch a few games and assess each team before jumping in with both feet. That’s all fine and dandy, but there are some interesting trends to exploit in Week 1 and we’d be remiss to ignore them. Let us quickly explain.

Gone are the days of dynasties, where the same core players stay intact and dominate the league year after year. Free agency and player movements can completely transform teams from one season to the next. In today’s parity-driven NFL, poor teams typically don’t stay poor for all that long and excellent teams must constantly reinvent themselves to stay on top.

The temptation might be to assume prior year results are the best indicator of who is going to cover in Week 1. To Joe Public, playoff teams from the prior season, home teams, favorites, and so one, look even more enticing than usual since there is no current season performance to judge them against. But the question begs: are the oddsmakers setting a trap?

To find the answer, we culled five years worth of Week 1 NFL data. As always, all of our analysis is done from an ATS perspective. The purpose here is to share the most important angles we unearthed and try to explain the logic behind them. So strap on your helmet, throw on your shoulder pads, and follow our lead as we expose some rare holes in the oddsmakers’ line of defense.

Home vs. Away Teams

Over the past five seasons, NFL home teams in Week 1 are just 31-42-7 ATS (42 percent). This of course implies that roadies are a 58 percent winning proposition during this time. The public at large has a tendency to overvalue home teams and this is especially true in Week 1 when there is no current season data to make predictions from. Consequently, the oddsmakers almost surely shade the home teams, by and large making road teams the choice for the value player.

Conclusion: Look long and hard at road teams first when handicapping the opening week.

Price ranges

Favorites are just 31-42-7 ATS (42 percent) in the opening week over the past five NFL seasons (Coincidentally, home teams hold the same ATS record as noted above). This means that underdogs bark at a 58 percent clip. Mid-range favorites performed the worst among our specified price ranges. In particular, favorites priced between –3 1/2 and –6 1/2 are only 8-15 ATS (35 percent) during this time.

The same basic pattern holds true when looking at home favorites (road favorites gravitate towards a 50 percent mean). Home favorites indeed are just 21-32-3 ATS (40 percent) in the first week of NFL action since 1999. Again, mid-range favorites are similarly the poorest performers when we look at home teams. Consider that home teams priced between –3 1/2 and –6 1/2 have stumbled to a 6-13 ATS (32 percent) mark in Week 1 games the past five seasons.

Conclusion: Like home teams, favorites and particularly mid-range favorites are generally overvalued in Week 1.

Playoff teams

It might surprise you to learn that playoff teams from the prior year versus non-playoff teams from the prior year are a mere 16-23-3 (41 percent) ATS in NFL Week 1 games over the past five seasons. Home teams which made the playoffs versus teams which did not make the playoffs from the prior season drop to a meager 7-14-1 ATS (33 percent) during this time.

Why are playoff teams, and in particular those at home, such bad bets the past five openers? Just as the case with home teams and with favorites, oddsmakers intentionally overprice playoff teams in the opening week to compensate for the public’s propensity to over bet them.

This theory holds true just looking at straight-up records from the past season as well. That is, home teams with winning records from the prior season vs. road teams with losing records from the prior season are just 8-13 ATS in Week 1 NFL games since 1999.

Conclusion: Playoff teams from the prior year and in particular, home playoff teams, are overvalued in Week 1 NFL games.

Scoring defense and scoring offense

Do good defenses and for that matter good offenses from the prior season fare better against the number the following year in Week 1 games? Well, sort of. Generally speaking, teams with a solid offense or defense from the prior season tend to do well in the opening week so long as they are on the road. As a host, however, the best offenses and best defenses from the prior year tend to be overvalued in Week 1.

Consider that the top five scoring defenses (i.e. points allowed) from the prior season are a nice 8-4 ATS (66 percent) on the road in NFL openers the past five seasons. Meanwhile, the top five scoring defenses from the prior season are just 3-8-2 ATS (27 percent) as a host in Week 1 during the same time period.

There is no discernable advantage or disadvantage for teams with a top five scoring offense (i.e. points scored) in Week 1 games. However, when we look at scoring offenses from the bottom up (isolating the five worst offenses from the prior season), the results are rather interesting. In particular, teams ranked in the bottom five in scoring offense from the prior season are 9-4-1 ATS (69 percent) when on the road in Week 1.

The logic is simply that the public perception is a poor scoring offensive unit from the year prior will have little chance of winning on the road in Week 1. In turn, the oddsmakers compensate for this perception and these poor offensive teams from the year prior carry extra line value on the Week 1 trail.

Conclusion: Teams with top-ranked defenses from the previous season are good bets when playing on the road, but poor bets when playing at home. Also, teams ranked among the bottom five in scoring offense from the prior season are generally a good value in their Week 1 openers, provided they are playing on the road.

Scoring margin

An exceedingly straightforward way of measuring scoring offense and scoring defense together as a whole is to look at a team's “margin." Margin is simply scoring offense minus scoring defense, which is a fairly clear-cut measure of how a team does on both sides of the ball. Typically, the higher the margin, the better the team.

In this regard, it might seem counterintuitive that teams carrying the higher margin from the prior season in week one matchups are merely 31-42-7 ATS (42 percent). Furthermore, road teams with the higher margin are 14-20-6 ATS (41 percent), while home teams with the higher margin are 17-22-1 ATS (44 percent). Once again, these results line up with the theory that better teams from the prior year are overvalued come opening day of the following season.

Conclusion: “Better” teams, which often boast a higher margin than their opponent, are overvalued the following season in NFL openers.

In sum

Oddsmakers cater NFL betting lines to match public perception and also to bait the public into poor bets. The temptation to use the prior year’s success as a buy sign for how a team will perform against the spread in Week 1 of the following season is an enormous trap.

The fact is, isolating road teams, road dogs, non-playoff teams vs. playoff teams, teams with a losing record or low margin vs. playoff teams or ones with a high margin from the previous year is where the line value resides. Quite simply, taking the road less traveled is your surest path to NFL betting profits.

To visit this sportsbook got to MySportsbook.com for all your Sportsbook accepts Visa needs.

Pacific-10 Conference odds

Teams that should be in: Stanford

Oregon and USC get their tickets punched after taking care of business this weekend. Yes, the Trojans' computer numbers aren't great, but there's no way the third-place team in this league is getting nixed. Grudgingly, I added Arizona after consultation with our Bracketologist. I don't know that Arizona will lose its last three (including a Pac-10 quarterfinal game), and even if the Cats do, I still can't see how they'd be left out, given the overall profile. That said, it bears watching, as three more L's would leave them at 18-12 (9-9) and on a 6-11 skid entering the Dance. It would be nice to see the Wildcats get at least one W in the Bay Area next week, as Cincinnati (albeit without Armein Kirkland and with a worse profile) was axed after a similar slide last season. I just couldn't rationalize having some of the other teams as locks and not having Arizona in that category -- there just aren't enough good teams behind the Cats to threaten their spot, it seems. Stanford has its fate in its own hands with the Arizona schools coming to the Farm to close out the regular season next weekend.

Should be in:

Stanford [17-10 (9-7), RPI: 40, SOS: 21] No shame in not getting a win in L.A., but that makes the home game against Arizona State a must-win ahead of what could be an intriguing meeting with Arizona should the Cats lose at Cal. Getting to 11 Pac-10 wins would make Selection Sunday much more comfortable, but 10's probably more than enough this season. The Cardinal have nonconference wins over Texas Tech and at Virginia to lean on, although they also lost badly to Air Force and Santa Clara at home.

Southeastern Conference odds
Work left to do: Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, Mississippi State

It looks more and more possible that no one from the SEC West will make the NCAAs. How weird is that? Tennessee and Vandy move into the locks category after more good work this weekend. Kentucky stays there, although it would be smart for the Cats to handle Georgia at home Wednesday ahead of a trip to the Swamp. Could a disaster scenario (two more L's and a first-round SEC tourney exit) somehow dislodge the Cats despite their incredible computer numbers? Still unlikely, but not worth chancing it.

Work left to do:

Alabama [19-9 (6-8), RPI: 43, SOS: 47] The tough L at Tennessee was understandable, and even created some hope. Unfortunately, that hope was dashed by a home loss to Auburn, which leaves the Tide in some real trouble. There's still no signature win on the profile (no, Kentucky doesn't count), and the computer profile is weakening rapidly. The Tide conceivably could beat Ole Miss and win at Miss. State to get to 8-8 and clinch at least a share of the West crown, but that's probably not enough right now. The Tide will need to do some work in the SEC tourney.

Georgia [16-10 (8-6), RPI: 52, SOS: 23] This is the team with the best chance to make it from this section right now. The Bulldogs rebounded from a terrible performance at Ole Miss to beat down Miss. State. Now they are at Kentucky (king of the RPI 51-100 win) and home to Tennessee. That would be worth a lot of computer points to get both (which is doable), as both teams are in the top 11 in RPI. Finishing at least 9-7 is an absolute must, and I would feel much better about the Dawgs' chances if they got both to get to 10 SEC wins. They also beat Gonzaga, but lost to ACC bubblers Georgia Tech and Clemson.

Mississippi [18-10 (7-7), RPI: 63, SOS: 79] Like everyone else in this division, Ole Miss gacked up a chance to stake a claim, losing by double figures at South Carolina. Even 9-7 likely is not nearly enough with a nonconference profile devoid of anything notable.

Mississippi State [16-11 (7-7), RPI: 66, SOS: 37] With a chance to get in the mix, these Bulldogs were leashed by their Georgia counterparts. Could they get to 9-7? I guess -- although winning at Arkansas, then beating Alabama is no lock -- but would that mean all that much for a team with this overall profile? Probably not. There's nothing of note (on the good side) in the nonconference profile.

For more College Basketball betting lines go to MySportsbook.com

Additional sports lines can be found at: www.Sportsbooks.com

To bet on March Madness games this online sportsbook accepts credit cards.